Assistant Professor, Imam Ali University (AS), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The experimental data of fluid mechanics is one of the main important tools for flow study and also an evaluation criterion of some methods such as the numerical methods. Thus, it is important that the quality of the data, measured in the laboratory be acceptable. One of the important properties of any flow is the fluid velocity field that is measured by different instruments. One of those tools is the SPIV tool. This tool provides sheet information from the flow velocity components. Generally, the data extracted from this tool would have big errors in some points of the velocity field, for various reasons and laboratory conditions, and the values obtained in these points known as gappy points, are eliminated. Therefore, some methods are needed to reconstruct the velocity field at these gaps. For this purpose, in the present study we have used artificial neural networks, such as MLP and CNN. The optimization of the number of neurons in the MLP network has been performed by the mean error of the test data and the matching of the images. The final error has been obtained for each of the methods, and considering the errors and taking into account the accommodation between the reconstructed velocity field and the experimental data, the results indicate that for both velocity components, the CNN neural network has had the best performance.
G. Raben, J. J. Charonko, and P. P. Vlachos, “Adaptive gappy proper orthogonal decomposition for particle image velocimetry data reconstruction”, Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 23, No. 2, p. 25303, 2012.
E. Murray and L. S. Ukeiley, “An application of Gappy POD”, Exp. Fluids, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 79–91, 2007.
Everson and L. Sirovich, “Karhunen–Loeve procedure for gappy data”, JOSA A, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 1657–1664, 1995.
Venturi and G. E. Karniadakis, “Gappy data and reconstruction procedures for flow past a cylinder”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 519, pp. 315–336, 2004.
Willcox, “Unsteady flow sensing and estimation via the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition”, Comput. Fluids, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 208–226, 2006.
Gunes, S. Sirisup, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Gappy data: To Krig or not to Krig?”, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 212, No. 1, pp. 358–382, 2006.
E. Meyer, J. M. Pedersen, and O. Özcan, “A turbulent jet in cross flow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 583, pp. 199–227, 2007.
Ahmed, H. El Kadi, and A. AlSharif, “Three-dimensional turbulent swirling flow reconstruction using artificial neural networks”, J. Mech. Eng. Autom., Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–9, 2014.
Fukami, K. Fukagata, and K. Taira, “Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 870, pp. 106–120, 2019.
T. Mohan and D. V Gaitonde, “A deep learning based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using LSTM neural networks”, arXivPrepr. arXiv1804.09269, 2018.
Cai, J. Liang, Q. Gao, C. Xu, and R. Wei, “Particle image velocimetry based on a deep learning motion estimator”, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 69, No. 6, pp. 3538–3554, 2019.
Evain, K. Faraz, T. Grenier, D. Garcia, M. De Craene, and O. Bernard, “A pilot study on convolutional neural networks for motion estimation from ultrasound images”, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, Vol. 67, No. 12, pp. 2565–2573, 2020.
HR, "Optimizing the Inlet of the Squirrel Nest Technique”, Msc Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 1998. (In Persian)
Firuznia, Neda, "Jet and wake impact analysis and noise generation over fan cut off from PIV experiments”, Msc Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 2016. (In Persian).
Loboda, I., Feldshteyn, Y., and Ponomaryov, V., “Neural Networks for Gas Turbine Fault Identification: Multilayer Perceptron or Radial Basis Network”, International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, 29(1), 37-48, 2012.
T. Pham and X. Liu, “Neural Networks for Identification”, Prediction and Control, Springer Verlag, London, 1995.
Hemmatasfe, M., esfande, S., and akhooundzade, M. “orecasting of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient in Turbulent Flow of Different Nanofluids in Circular Tubes, Using Artificial Neural Network”, Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics Journal, 7(1), pp. 1-11, 2018.
Yu W, Huang S, and Xiao W. Fault Diagnosis Based on an Approach Combining a Spectrogram and a Convolutional Neural Network with Application to a Wind Turbine System. Energies. 2018; 11(10):2561. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102561
Zhou, D., Yao, Q., Wu, H., and Zhang, H., “Fault diagnosis of gas turbine based on partly interpretable convolutional neural networks”, Energy, Vol. 200, 1 June 2020, 117467.
farajollahi, A., Rostami, M., & Naderi, A. (2022). Reconstruction of the Fluid Velocity Field Measured by SPIV via Artificial Neural Networks. Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics, 11(1), 57-70.
MLA
amirhamzeh farajollahi; Mohsen Rostami; Aliasghar Naderi. "Reconstruction of the Fluid Velocity Field Measured by SPIV via Artificial Neural Networks", Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics, 11, 1, 2022, 57-70.
HARVARD
farajollahi, A., Rostami, M., Naderi, A. (2022). 'Reconstruction of the Fluid Velocity Field Measured by SPIV via Artificial Neural Networks', Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics, 11(1), pp. 57-70.
VANCOUVER
farajollahi, A., Rostami, M., Naderi, A. Reconstruction of the Fluid Velocity Field Measured by SPIV via Artificial Neural Networks. Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics, 2022; 11(1): 57-70.
)
