Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics

Fluid Mechanics & Aerodynamics

The effect of geometry changes on aerodynamic coefficients of a canard control air-to-air missile

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master's degree, Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University of Science and Technology. Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor,Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University of Science and Technology. Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University of Science and Technology. Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In this article, the effect of changes in the wing and canard geometry and body length on the aerodynamic coefficients of the Sidewinder missile has been investigated using MD and Ansys CFX software. First, using the MD code, the aerodynamic coefficients of five different shapes of this missile have been investigated in different flight conditions. To verify the MD data, the data obtained from a model of this missile was examined with existing wind tunnel data. The results showed that in all flight conditions, the change of aerodynamic coefficients is the same, and at the low attack angles, the data has very good agreement with the experimental data, and also, the new series of the missile have a better range and maneuverability than its initial series. Next, using the MD code results, the flow around the existing missile (AIM-9L) and the new missile (AIM-9X) has been simulated using CFX software. At this point, investigations were carried out using an unstructured mesh and K- ω SST turbulence model. To verify the numerical method, one model of this missile was examined and by comparing it with the available data, a maximum error of 4% was observed for the numerical method. The results showed that the applied geometrical changes had increased the lift to drag ratio of the new missile compared to the existing missile, and its stability has also decreased, and the range of the new missile has also increased by about 43%.
Keywords

Smiley face

Jan’s magazine, air-launched weapons, US, 2002.
[2] M. Allen J, Blair Jr AB, Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Forward Control Missile,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 155–159, 1982.
[3] Blair Jr AB, Allen JM, Hernandez G, Effect of tail-fin span on stability and control characteristics of a Canard-controlled missile at supersonic Mach numbers, NASA TN2157,1983.
[4] Blair AB, Rapp G, Experimental and analytical comparison of aerodynamic characteristics of a forward-control missile, in 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, California, pp.1-11, 1980.
[5] Graves EB, Fournier RH, Stability and control characteristics at Mach numbers from 0.2 to 4.63 of a cruciform air-to-air missile with triangular canard controls and a trapezoidal wing, NASA TM X-3070, 1974.
[6] Rapp G, Performance improvements with Sidewinder missile airframe variants, in 17th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1979.
[7] Blair Jr B, Dillon JL, Watson CB, Experimental Study of Tail-Span Effects on a Canard-Controlled Missile, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol.30, No.5, pp.635–640, 1993.
[8] Smith EH, Hebbar SK, Platzer M, Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Canard-Controlled Missile at High Angles of Attack, in 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, pp.1-9,1993.
[9] Smith, E. H., et al. (1994). "Aerodynamic characteristics of a canard-controlled missile at high angles of attack." Journal of spacecraft and rockets 31(5): 766-772.
[10] Hsieh T, Priolo FJ, Wardlaw Jr AB, Navier-Stokes Calculation of Flow Over a Complete Missile to 60 Degree Incidence, in 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, pp. 1–8, 1995.  DOI:10.2514/6.1995-760
[11] Wee HC, Aerodynamic analysis of a canard missile configuration using ANSYS-CFX, MSc Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey California, 2011.
[12] Yue, C.-g., et al. (2011). Numerical Simulation on Aerodynamic Characteristic of an Air-to-Air Missile. International Workshop on Computer Science for Environmental Engineering and Ecoinformatics, Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-22691-5_83
[13] Honkanen, T., et al. (2011). CFD simulations and wind tunnel experiments of a generic split-canard air-to-air missile at high angles of attack in turbulent subsonic flow. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6335
[14] Feyzioglu E, Roll characteristics and shape optimization of the free to-rotate tail-fins on a canard-controlled missile, MSc Thesis, Middle East Technical University, 2014.
[15] Al Kaabi, H., et al. (2019). "Numerical and Experimental Determination of Canard Controlled Missile Aerodynamic Coefficients in Subsonic Regime." Tehnički vjesnik 26(3): 674-680. DOI: 10.17559/TV-20180724143418
[16] Tahani, M., et al. (2017). "Aerodynamic performance improvement of a canard control missile." Aircraft engineering and aerospace technology 89(6): 871-878. DOI: 10.1108/AEAT-01-2016-0019
[20] Zhang, J., et al. (2020). "The numerical investigation on the rolling decoupling of a canard-controlled missile using the jet control system." Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 14(1): 1062-1077. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2020.1799866
 
Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 35
Spring and summer
September 2025
Pages 171-191

  • Receive Date 17 April 2025
  • Revise Date 12 June 2025
  • Accept Date 28 June 2025
  • Publish Date 23 July 2025