نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
An efficient approach to control the engine of a commercial aircraft is the Min-Max multi-loop structure. In this paper, a Min-Max controller with a switching structure containing output feedback regulators and a saturation function on the fuel flow rate is designed for a turbofan engine. In addition to desirable performance, the stability analysis is an important issue in the process of controller design for aero-engines. Because of the switching behavior of the Min-Max approach, the stability of each single loop by itself does not ensure the stability of the whole system. Therefore, a procedure is provided to analyze the stability of the closed loop system. For this purpose, the Min and Max operators and the saturation function are replaced by their nonlinear equivalents and the structure of the control system is converted to the canonical configuration of the Lure’s system. Then, the conditions for asymptotic stability are extracted and using the presented approach, an asymptotic stability proof is achieved for the closed loop system. In a simulation study with the nonlinear model of a turbofan engine, the performance of the designed Min-Max controller in the thrust attainment and limitation management is compared with the Min-Max/SMC technique.
کلیدواژهها [English]
. Csang, J.T., May, R.D., Guo, T.H., and Litt, J. “The Effect of Modified Control Limits on the Performance of a Generic
Commercial Aircraft Engine”, NASA/TM—2012-217261, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2012.
Regulators”, NASA/TM—2012-217814, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2012.
Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2013.
Approach”, J. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. Vol. 68, pp. 214-222, 2017.
Controller Structure”, J. Control, Automat. Electr. Systs. Vol. 30, pp. 27-40, 2019.
System”, Asian J. Control, Published Online, 2021.
Turbine Aero-Engines Control: from Whittle Engine to More-Electric Propulsion”, J. Meas. Control, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp.
935-966, 2021.
Engines”, J. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. Vol. 56, pp. 70-89, 2016.
Sons, Inc, New Jersey, US, 2011.
Control Conf., Karlsruhe, Germany, 31 August–3 September 1999.
2003.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2003.
10, pp. 2251-2259, 2011.
Control Dyn. Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1132-1142, 2012.
its Application to Gas Turbine Engines”, Eur. J. Control, Vol. 52, pp. 97-107, 2020.
Proof”, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 1359-1368, 2019.
Aircraft Engine”, NASA/TM—2008-215303, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2008.
NASA/TM—2009-215668, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2009.
Management and Low Computational Burden”, T. I. Meas. Control, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 36-44, 2018.
Engine’s Thermodynamic Model”, Aerosp. Mech. J., Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 17-32, 2019. (In Persian)
and Performance Comparison with a Min-Max Controller”, J. Fluid Mech. and AeroDyn., Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 161-176, 2019.
(In Persian)
Simulation Using the Toolbox for Modeling and Analysis of Thermodynamic Systems (T-MATS)”, NASA/TM—2014-
218402, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2014.
Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2017.
Circle, and Popov Theorems and Their Application to Robust Stability. Part I: Continuous-Time Theory”, Int. J. Robust
Nonlin. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 313-339, 1993.
2004.