نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه سمنان
2 دانشکده مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
To establish a variety of cavitating flow regimes, the combined body with wedge nose and rectangular afterbody is usually used. In this research work, the nose angle and the afterbody dimensions of model were 60° and 22cmx10cmx1cm, respectively. Its fabricated material is nearly smooth steel with roughness of 0.01mm. Also, another model with 30° nose angle and the same dimensions of the afterbody is tested. Two mentioned bodies were installed at the test section of a high speed cavitation tunnel. If the speed and pressure of the flow in the tunnel are varied, first cavitation inception occurs, such as a white band at the interface. Then, a little decrease the cavitation number causes the sheet cavitation along the surfaces of the afterbody. However, they are not established simultaneously at the upper and lower planes of the afterbody. By increasing the length of the sheet cavitation, regular oscillation occurs. Observed cloud cavitation is due to the separation of sheet regime which occurs by the re-entrant jet. If cavitation number is decreased slowly, then the vapor sheet covers the upper and lower planes of the afterbody. At the same cavitation numbers, cloud cavitation regimes on the two mentioned planes are not equal. At an especial length of the sheet cavity, the rate of length increase will be intensified.
کلیدواژهها [English]
10. Reisman, G.E., Wang Y.C., and Brennen, C.E. “Observations of Shock Waves in Cloud Cavitation” , J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 355, pp. 255-283, 1998.
11. Dular, M. and Petkovsek, M. "Simultaneous Observation of Cavitating Structures and Cavitation Erosion”, Wear, Vol. 300, pp. 55-64, 2013.
12. Franc, J.P. “Partial Cavity Instabilities and Re-entrant Jet”, International Symposium on Cavitation CAV2001, Pasadena, USA, 2001.
13. Kravtsova, A.Y. , Markovich, D.M., Pervunin, K.S., and Imoshevskiy, M.V.T, “Experimental Investigation of Cavitating Flow about a Cascade of NACA0015 Series Hydrofoils”, the 16th Int. Symp. on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 09-12, 2012.
14. Ji, B., Luo X.W., Roger E., Arndt, A., Xiaoxing P., and Wu,Y. ”Large Eddy Simulation and Theoretical Investigations of the Transient Cavitating Vortical flow Structure around a NACA66 Hydrofoil”, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 68, pp.121–134, 2015.
15. Brander, P.A., Walker, G.J., Niekamp, P.N. and Anderson, B. “An Experimental Investigation of Cloud Cavitation about a Sphere”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 656, pp. 147-176, 2010.
16. Biluš, I., Bombek,G., Hočevar, M., Širok, B., Cenčič, T., and Petkovšek, M. “The Experimental Analysis of Cavitating Structure Fluctuations and Pressure Pulsations in the Cavitation Station”, J. Mech. Eng., Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 147-157, 2014.
17. Jafari Gavzan, I. and Rad, M. ”Influence of After Body and Boundary Layer on Cavitating Flow”, Int. J. Eng., Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 185–196, 2009.
18. Brennen, C.E. “Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics”, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2014.
19. Gnanaskandan, A. and Mahesh, K. “Numerical Investigation of Near-Wake Characteristics of Cavitating Flow over a Circular Cylinder”, JFM, Vol. 790, pp. 453-491, 2016.
20. Shams, I., Jafari Gavzan, I., and Rad, M. “Evaluation of Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Cavitation and Bubble Development”, ISME Conference, Isfahan, Iran, 2006.